A Fiesta in the Desert
By: Joel Brennan, Sports Journalism
When asked to recount a memorable game, I could talk about any one of many starting with Joe Carter Game 6 of the 1993 World Series, Michael Jordan and the 1996 Chicago Bulls, or even the 15-run comeback by the Cleveland Indians against the Seattle Mariners (to a Mariners fan, this was mind-blowing despite being inconsequential) a few years ago. However, in the age of instant gratification and over-used superlatives, I chose to talk about the 2007 Fiesta Bowl between
This game was a stereotypical “David vs. Goliath” match-up that actually held true to the story. The role of David was played by
With the game being played in
All of the excitement was overwhelming even for a casual fan of the sport, but to a fanatic like me, this was a 15 on a 1-10 scale in terms of excitement. Over the course of a season, fans may see a trick play here and there, but to see three of them in one game and all work to perfection was astounding. The game became an instant classic (an ever-increasing phenomenon) for two reasons. The first is obvious; the second is because of what the game meant. It was that Cinderella story that college basketball fan’s look for every March. It showed that non-BCS schools can truly compete with the bigger schools in BCS conferences. The significance of this game should be set forth a precedent to selection committees who are only looking for high-profit match-ups, that even the smaller schools can provide excitement and really deserve the opportunity to showcase their talent.
Months after the excitement ended the story continues. Zabransky was recently named the cover athlete for EA Sports’ NCAA Football 2008. It marks the first time the cover athlete is not from a BCS-conference school. Also, there are rumors that the 2006-07
1 Comments:
Joel:
Truly a game for the ages - Boise State definitely would have played for the national title, if I had my way and the NCAA finally implemented a playoff system.
Your piece is great - just a few tweaks.
First, I would be remiss in my role as a married person if I didn't point that you "propose" to someone, not "purpose" to someone, as you write at the end of the second to last graph. I love the parethentical addition at the end of that graph.
I agree with your parenthetical reference in the next graph to the fact that we throw terms like "instant classic" around way too easily, and too soon, these days. Maybe it's because we're so obsessed with leaving legacies; we have Bill Clinton to thank for this. But this topic is important, and deserves more exploration - it would make a great think piece, perhaps for story #3.
Careful with your plurals and possessives. In that same graph, you wrote "fan's," where it should be "fans."
Never thought I'd see "david v. goliath" and "Cinderella story" appear in the same story. Careful with cliches - be precise and descriptive. How could you replace these in the story?
In the graph starting with "Boise State had...," it should be "led," not "lead."
Two paragraphs earlier, last sentence: a few too many "theys." Start with "Boise State" or the team's nickname, which is escaping me now - Broncos?
Last graph: I think it's tighter to say "cover athlete for," not "of."
Solid stuff. Two points.
12:33 PM
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home